Rankings · Metropolitan borough in England

Separate leagues. England, Scotland and Wales are measured differently, so a rank in one is not comparable with another. Why. England is stable; Scotland and Wales are provisional.

Manchester

Manchester council ranks 33rd of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 23rd to 48th), in the upper middle. Strongest on service quality (22nd of 130), weakest on value for money (81st of 127).

Formally the Manchester City Council.

Compare Manchester with another council

Data period: Oldest figures 2024-25 (DEFRA and DHSC); newest as at 2026-11 (CQC). Published by CQC, DEFRA, DHSC, DfE, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, MHCLG and Ofsted.

Data last updated: · Last checked: . Sources publish on their own schedules, so figures can be older than the last check.

Methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "Manchester council, Council Rankings, 1 November 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/manchester/"

33rd of 130
single-tier councils in England
Upper middle

Likely range 23rd–48th. Stays in the upper middle in 60% of re-runs. How we work this out

16th of 36
metropolitan boroughs only
Upper middle

How Manchester scores

Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that Manchester beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.

Service quality

Allowing for need, Manchester ranks 7th of 130 (likely range 4th–21st), against 22nd unadjusted. That is 15 places higher once need is allowed for. The difference is larger than the uncertainty, so this is one of the few councils where allowing for need clearly changes the picture (why).

Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust

Planning

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better94.3%93.7%57 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better93.4%92.0%52 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only1,9241,092–2025-26

Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)

Waste & recycling

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better38.9%37.4%60 / 1302024-25
Residual household waste per household Lower is better395 kg516 kg20 / 1302024-25

Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management

Complaints

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better4.84.865 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better82.4%81.9%=67 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better73.1%75.0%75 / 1282025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only100.0%100.0%–2025-26
Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only23.5%15.2%–2025-26

Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data

Children's services

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is betterOutstandingGood=1 / 130latest at 2026-03-31
Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is better3.75 / 4Good=15 / 130latest at 2026-03-31

Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes

Adult social care

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better72.2%Good assessment published 5 August 202663.9%=17 / 126latest at 2026-11
Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better0.4120.417=73 / 1292024-25
People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better60.9%65.5%=105 / 1292024-25
Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better64.7%62.5%=44 / 1192024-25
Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better86.6%83.9%40 / 1292024-25
People who use services who feel safe Higher is better71.0%70.7%63 / 1292024-25

Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework

Special educational needs

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better75.6%58.3%46 / 1302024 to 2025

Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans

Homelessness

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better53.5%51.7%55 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better12.0%33.5%=124 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better11.92.898 / 1262026-03
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context only00–2026-03

Source: MHCLG — Statutory homelessness statistics

Value for money

Adult social care value for money

Manchester spends £682 per adult on adult social care, against about £637 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and whether a council is in London (£45 more). Its adult social care results rank 44th of 125.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 90th of 122

Children's services value for money

Manchester spends £1,723 per child on children's services, against about £1,890 expected after allowing for child poverty and whether a council is in London (£168 less). Its children's services results rank 15th of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 50th of 127

Waste value for money

Manchester spends £229 per home on waste & recycling, against about £187 expected after allowing for deprivation, whether a council is in London and share of census output areas classed rural (£42 more). Its waste & recycling results rank 33rd of 130.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 110th of 127

Planning value for money

Manchester spends £-163 per planning decision on planning, against about £702 expected after allowing for whether a council is in London (£865 less). Its planning results rank 51st of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 16th of 127

Financial health

Reserves

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better38.9%33.0%48 / 1272025-26
Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better-3.6%0.4%101 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Debt

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better16.0%9.7%108 / 1272025-26
Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better251.2%184.6%95 / 1272024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Schools funding deficit

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better8.3%8.8%58 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Government bailouts

MeasureManchesterMedian of 130RankPeriod
Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better0.0%0.0%=1 / 1272024-25 to 2026-27

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Context

Background figures. These don't count towards the score.

Population588,256median 277,253mid-2025
Net service spend per resident£2,277.56median £2,026.282025-26
Index of Multiple Deprivation average score38.677median 24.0572025
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks0median 02026-03
Who runs the councilLabour majority16 September 2026
Seats on the councilLabour 63, Green 21, Reform UK 7, Liberal Democrat 4, Independent and other 1 (of 96 seats)16 September 2026
Audit opinion on the latest accountsNo audit opinion signed yet. PSAA status: unsigned.2025-26
Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed1median 12023-24 to 2025-26
Band D council tax (council element)£1,872.79median £1,969.002026-27
Band D council tax change on previous year5.0%median 5.0%2026-27
Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority)£2,312.04median £2,435.012026-27

Also responsible in Manchester

These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Manchester's score.

Councils nearby

The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.

Full ranking of metropolitan boroughs · All 130 councils

Questions about Manchester

How good is Manchester council?

Manchester ranks 33rd of 130 single-tier councils in England overall, in the upper middle, and 16th of 36 metropolitan boroughs. Its likely range is 23rd to 48th. Its highest rank is on service quality (22nd of 130) and its lowest on value for money (81st of 127). Ranks are on official data for service quality, value for money and financial health; nearby places are similar, so read it as a position, not a verdict. How we score · Compare Manchester

Is Manchester a single-tier council?

Yes. Manchester is a metropolitan borough (formally the Manchester City Council), and runs almost all local services in its area itself, with no county or district council alongside it. A few services are run by other bodies, listed above. Who is ranked

ONS code E08000003 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog