Rankings · Unitary council
Redcar and Cleveland
Redcar and Cleveland council ranks 46th of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 23rd to 76th), in the upper middle. Strongest on service quality (24th of 130), weakest on financial health (115th of 127).
Compare Redcar and Cleveland with another council
Data as of 13 October 2026 · methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "Redcar and Cleveland council, Council Rankings, 13 October 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/redcar-and-cleveland/"
Likely range 23rd–76th. Stays in the upper middle in 66% of re-runs. How we work this out
How Redcar and Cleveland scores
Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that Redcar and Cleveland beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.
Service quality
Allowing for need, Redcar and Cleveland ranks 22nd of 130 (likely range 9th–51st), against 24th unadjusted. That is about the same: need explains little of the difference between councils.
Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust
Planning
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better | 94.4% | 93.7% | =55 / 130 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better | 88.0% | 92.0% | 90 / 130 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only | 418 | 1,092 | – | 2025-26 |
Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)
Waste & recycling
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better | 30.7% | 37.4% | =99 / 130 | 2024-25 |
| Residual household waste per household Lower is better | 552 kg | 516 kg | 92 / 130 | 2024-25 |
Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management
Complaints
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better | 2.2 | 4.8 | =1 / 130 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better | 66.7% | 81.9% | =1 / 130 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better | 100.0% | 75.0% | =1 / 128 | 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only | 100.0% | 100.0% | – | 2025-26 |
| Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only | 33.3% | 15.2% | – | 2025-26 |
Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data
Children's services
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is better | Good | Good | =40 / 130 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
| Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is better | 2.75 / 4 | Good | =76 / 130 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes
Adult social care
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better | 58.3%Requires improvement assessment published 4 July 2025 | 63.9% | =86 / 126 | latest at 2026-10-13 |
| Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better | 0.416 | 0.417 | =66 / 129 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better | 70.8% | 65.5% | 8 / 129 | 2024-25 |
| Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better | 72.6% | 62.5% | 8 / 119 | 2024-25 |
| Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better | 87.8% | 83.9% | 31 / 129 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services who feel safe Higher is better | 69.1% | 70.7% | 81 / 129 | 2024-25 |
Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework
Special educational needs
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better | 31.8% | 58.3% | 99 / 130 | 2024 to 2025 |
Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans
Homelessness
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better | 89.3% | 51.7% | =1 / 130 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better | 74.2% | 33.5% | =1 / 130 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better | Not reported this quarter | 2.8 | – | 2026-03 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context only | Not reported this quarter | 0 | – | 2026-03 |
Value for money
Adult social care value for money
Redcar and Cleveland spends £604 per adult on adult social care, against about £666 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and whether a council is in London (£62 less). Its adult social care results rank 45th of 125.
Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 13th of 122
Children's services value for money
Redcar and Cleveland spends £2,589 per child on children's services, against about £1,710 expected after allowing for child poverty and whether a council is in London (£879 more). Its children's services results rank 76th of 130.
Weaker results, higher cost · value for money rank 122nd of 127
Waste value for money
Redcar and Cleveland spends £172 per home on waste & recycling, against about £203 expected after allowing for deprivation, whether a council is in London and share of census output areas classed rural (£32 less). Its waste & recycling results rank 98th of 130.
Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 27th of 127
Planning value for money
Redcar and Cleveland spends £-715 per planning decision on planning, against about £702 expected after allowing for whether a council is in London (£1,417 less). Its planning results rank 75th of 130.
Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 2nd of 127
Financial health
Redcar and Cleveland needed Exceptional Financial Support from government (2024-25 to 2026-27), so it ranks below every council that did not on financial health.
Reserves
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better | 10.5% | 33.0% | 120 / 127 | 2025-26 |
| Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better | -1.2% | 0.4% | 82 / 127 | 2025-26 |
Debt
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | 10.2% | 9.7% | 67 / 127 | 2025-26 |
| Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | 186.7% | 184.6% | 65 / 127 | 2024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend |
Schools funding deficit
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | 14.3% | 8.8% | 87 / 127 | 2025-26 |
Government bailouts
| Measure | Redcar and Cleveland | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | 12.5% | 0.0% | 101 / 127 | 2024-25 to 2026-27 |
Context
Background figures. These don't count towards the score.
| Population | 139,541 | median 277,253 | mid-2025 |
| Net service spend per resident | £2,003.03 | median £2,026.28 | 2025-26 |
| Index of Multiple Deprivation average score | 30.336 | median 24.057 | 2025 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks | Not reported this quarter | median 0 | 2026-03 |
| Who runs the council | Labour minority administration | 16 September 2026 | |
| Seats on the council | Labour 20, Independent and other 16, Conservative 12, Liberal Democrat 10, Reform UK 1 (of 59 seats) | 16 September 2026 | |
| Audit opinion on the latest accounts | Opinion signed 26 February 2026. PSAA status: delivered by backstop. | 2024-25 | |
| Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed | 0 | median 0 | 2022-23 to 2024-25 |
| Band D council tax (council element) | £2,094.03 | median £1,969.00 | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax change on previous year | 5.0% | median 5.0% | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority) | £2,544.48 | median £2,435.01 | 2026-27 |
Also responsible in Redcar and Cleveland
These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Redcar and Cleveland's score.
- Tees Valley Combined Authority: transport; adult skills; economic development
Councils nearby
The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.
- Middlesbrough: 86th of 130, lower middle · compare
- Hartlepool: 4th of 130, top quarter · compare
- Stockton-on-Tees: 63rd of 130, upper middle · compare
- Darlington: 11th of 130, top quarter · compare
- County Durham: 12th of 130, top quarter · compare
ONS code E06000003 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog