Rankings · Metropolitan borough in England

Separate leagues. England, Scotland and Wales are measured differently, so a rank in one is not comparable with another. Why. England is stable; Scotland and Wales are provisional.

Wolverhampton

Wolverhampton council ranks 45th of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 27th to 64th), in the upper middle. Strongest on value for money (16th of 127), weakest on service quality (67th of 130).

Formally the City of Wolverhampton Council.

Compare Wolverhampton with another council

Data period: Oldest figures 2024-25 (DEFRA and DHSC); newest as at 2026-11 (CQC). Published by CQC, DEFRA, DHSC, DfE, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, MHCLG and Ofsted.

Data last updated: · Last checked: . Sources publish on their own schedules, so figures can be older than the last check.

Methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "Wolverhampton council, Council Rankings, 1 November 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/wolverhampton/"

45th of 130
single-tier councils in England
Upper middle

Likely range 27th–64th. Stays in the upper middle in 82% of re-runs. How we work this out

14th of 36
metropolitan boroughs only
Upper middle

How Wolverhampton scores

Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that Wolverhampton beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.

Service quality

Allowing for need, Wolverhampton ranks 57th of 130 (likely range 37th–73rd), against 67th unadjusted. That is 10 places higher once need is allowed for, within the likely range.

Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust

Planning

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better97.3%93.7%35 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better98.8%92.0%14 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only8171,092–2025-26

Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)

Waste & recycling

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better32.7%37.4%87 / 1302024-25
Residual household waste per household Lower is better591 kg516 kg108 / 1302024-25

Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management

Complaints

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better2.94.818 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better80.0%81.9%=43 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better100.0%75.0%=1 / 1282025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only100.0%100.0%–2025-26
Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only0.0%15.2%–2025-26

Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data

Children's services

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is betterGoodGood=40 / 130latest at 2026-03-31
Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is better3.25 / 4Good=43 / 130latest at 2026-03-31

Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes

Adult social care

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better63.9%Good assessment published 26 June 202663.9%=55 / 126latest at 2026-11
Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better0.4360.417=22 / 1292024-25
People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better63.3%65.5%82 / 1292024-25
Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better57.7%62.5%92 / 1192024-25
Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better86.2%83.9%=43 / 1292024-25
People who use services who feel safe Higher is better70.9%70.7%64 / 1292024-25

Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework

Special educational needs

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better39.3%58.3%86 / 1302024 to 2025

Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans

Homelessness

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better42.3%51.7%102 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better18.9%33.5%118 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better2.22.857 / 1262026-03
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context only10–2026-03

Source: MHCLG — Statutory homelessness statistics

Value for money

Adult social care value for money

Wolverhampton spends £633 per adult on adult social care, against about £620 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and whether a council is in London (£13 more). Its adult social care results rank 52nd of 125.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 75th of 122

Children's services value for money

Wolverhampton spends £1,461 per child on children's services, against about £1,821 expected after allowing for child poverty and whether a council is in London (£360 less). Its children's services results rank 43rd of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 23rd of 127

Waste value for money

Wolverhampton spends £134 per home on waste & recycling, against about £182 expected after allowing for deprivation, whether a council is in London and share of census output areas classed rural (£48 less). Its waste & recycling results rank 104th of 130.

Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 8th of 127

Planning value for money

Wolverhampton spends £378 per planning decision on planning, against about £702 expected after allowing for whether a council is in London (£324 less). Its planning results rank 16th of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 47th of 127

Financial health

Reserves

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better32.4%33.0%68 / 1272025-26
Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better5.4%0.4%26 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Debt

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better14.4%9.7%99 / 1272025-26
Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better248.1%184.6%94 / 1272024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Schools funding deficit

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better5.3%8.8%38 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Government bailouts

MeasureWolverhamptonMedian of 130RankPeriod
Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better0.0%0.0%=1 / 1272024-25 to 2026-27

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Context

Background figures. These don't count towards the score.

Population281,434median 277,253mid-2025
Net service spend per resident£1,958.98median £2,026.282025-26
Index of Multiple Deprivation average score32.552median 24.0572025
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks1median 02026-03
Who runs the councilLabour majority16 September 2026
Seats on the councilLabour 35, Reform UK 13, Conservative 10, Independent and other 2 (of 60 seats)16 September 2026
Audit opinion on the latest accountsNo audit opinion signed yet. PSAA status: unsigned.2025-26
Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed1median 12023-24 to 2025-26
Band D council tax (council element)£2,209.30median £1,969.002026-27
Band D council tax change on previous year5.0%median 5.0%2026-27
Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority)£2,538.99median £2,435.012026-27

Also responsible in Wolverhampton

These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Wolverhampton's score.

Councils nearby

The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.

Full ranking of metropolitan boroughs · All 130 councils

Questions about Wolverhampton

How good is Wolverhampton council?

Wolverhampton ranks 45th of 130 single-tier councils in England overall, in the upper middle, and 14th of 36 metropolitan boroughs. Its likely range is 27th to 64th. Its highest rank is on value for money (16th of 127) and its lowest on service quality (67th of 130). Ranks are on official data for service quality, value for money and financial health; nearby places are similar, so read it as a position, not a verdict. How we score · Compare Wolverhampton

Is Wolverhampton a single-tier council?

Yes. Wolverhampton is a metropolitan borough (formally the City of Wolverhampton Council), and runs almost all local services in its area itself, with no county or district council alongside it. A few services are run by other bodies, listed above. Who is ranked

ONS code E08000031 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog