Rankings · Metropolitan borough
Wolverhampton
Likely range 18th–38th. Stays in the upper middle in 83% of re-runs. How we work this out
How Wolverhampton scores
Bar length shows the share of the 68 councils that Wolverhampton beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%.
Service quality
Planning
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major planning decisions made in time (24 months)Higher is better | 97.3% | 94.5% | 25 / 68 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months)Higher is better | 98.8% | 93.1% | 7 / 68 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Planning decisions in the financial yearHigher is better · context only | 817 | 1,247 | – | 2025-26 |
Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)
Waste & recycling
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household waste sent for reuse recycling or compostingHigher is better | 32.7% | 32.9% | 37 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| Residual household waste per householdLower is better | 591 kg | 504 kg | 56 / 68 | 2024-25 |
Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management
Complaints
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residentsLower is better | 2.9 | 5.6 | 8 / 68 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman investigations upheldLower is better | 80.0% | 82.4% | =16 / 68 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implemented on timeHigher is better | 100.0% | 74.7% | =1 / 68 | 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implementedHigher is better · context only | 100.0% | 100.0% | – | 2025-26 |
| Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the OmbudsmanHigher is better · context only | 0.0% | 15.2% | – | 2025-26 |
Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data
Children's services
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services)Higher is better | Good | Good | =25 / 68 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
| Ofsted sub-judgements (average)Higher is better | 3.25 / 4 | Good | =26 / 68 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes
Adult social care
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted)Higher is better | 0.436 | 0.416 | =13 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services satisfied with their care and supportHigher is better | 63.3% | 63.0% | 33 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablementHigher is better | 57.7% | 62.9% | 50 / 64 | 2024-25 |
| People receiving long-term support who live in their own home or with familyHigher is better | 86.2% | 84.6% | =25 / 67 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services who feel safeHigher is better | 70.9% | 69.8% | 29 / 68 | 2024-25 |
Source: DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework
Special educational needs
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New EHC plans issued within 20 weeksHigher is better | 39.3% | 68.3% | 49 / 68 | 2024 to 2025 |
Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans
Homelessness
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ monthsHigher is better | 42.3% | 51.5% | 54 / 68 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ monthsHigher is better | 18.9% | 31.2% | 63 / 68 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 householdsLower is better | 2.2 | 7.0 | 24 / 68 | 2026-03 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeksLower is better · context only | 1 | 0 | – | 2026-03 |
Value for money
Adult social care value for money
Wolverhampton spends £633 per adult on adult social care, against about £622 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and whether a council is in London (£11 more). Its adult social care results rank 26th of 68.
Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 39th of 66
Children's services value for money
Wolverhampton spends £1,461 per child on children's services, against about £1,695 expected after allowing for child poverty and whether a council is in London (£234 less). Its children's services results rank 26th of 68.
Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 24th of 66
Waste value for money
Wolverhampton spends £134 per home on waste & recycling, against about £191 expected after allowing for deprivation and whether a council is in London (£57 less). Its waste & recycling results rank 51st of 68.
Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 4th of 66
Planning value for money
Wolverhampton spends £378 per planning decision on planning, against about £632 expected after allowing for whether a council is in London (£254 less). Its planning results rank 8th of 68.
Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 26th of 66
Financial health
Reserves
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditureHigher is better | 32.4% | 34.7% | 40 / 66 | 2025-26 |
| Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditureHigher is better | 5.4% | 0.3% | 11 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Debt costs
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 14.4% | 9.3% | 50 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Schools funding deficit
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 5.3% | 8.0% | 22 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Government bailouts
| Measure | Wolverhampton | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 0.0% | 0.0% | =1 / 66 | 2024-25 to 2026-27 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Context
Background figures. These don't count towards the score.
| Population | 281,434 | median 296,363 | mid-2025 |
| Net service spend per resident | £1,958.98 | median £2,139.02 | 2025-26 |
| Index of Multiple Deprivation average score | 32.552 | median 26.299 | 2025 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks | 1 | median 0 | 2026-03 |
| Band D council tax (council element) | £2,209.30 | median £1,884.22 | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax change on previous year | 5.0% | median 5.0% | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority) | £2,538.99 | median £2,319.87 | 2026-27 |
What residents say
Ratings from signed-in visitors. They are shown here for context and are not part of the official-data ranking.
Loading ratings…
Rate Wolverhampton
Loading…
Also responsible in Wolverhampton
These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Wolverhampton's score.
- West Midlands Combined Authority: transport; adult skills; economic development
ONS code E08000031 · How we score