Rankings · London borough in England
Separate leagues. England, Scotland and Wales are measured differently, so a rank in one is not comparable with another. Why. England is stable; Scotland and Wales are provisional.
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith and Fulham council ranks 76th of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 45th to 96th), in the lower middle. Strongest on financial health (2nd of 127), weakest on value for money (110th of 127).
Formally the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham.
Compare Hammersmith and Fulham with another council
Data period: Oldest figures 2024-25 (DEFRA and DHSC); newest as at 2026-11 (CQC). Published by CQC, DEFRA, DHSC, DfE, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, MHCLG and Ofsted.
Data last updated: · Last checked: . Sources publish on their own schedules, so figures can be older than the last check.
Methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "Hammersmith and Fulham council, Council Rankings, 1 November 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/hammersmith-and-fulham/"
Likely range 45th–96th. Stays in the lower middle in 65% of re-runs. How we work this out
How Hammersmith and Fulham scores
Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that Hammersmith and Fulham beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.
Service quality
Allowing for need, Hammersmith and Fulham ranks 93rd of 130 (likely range 65th–106th), against 90th unadjusted. That is about the same: need explains little of the difference between councils.
Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust
Planning
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better | 91.7% | 93.7% | =80 / 130 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better | 86.8% | 92.0% | 98 / 130 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only | 1,321 | 1,092 | – | 2025-26 |
Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)
Waste & recycling
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better | 30.2% | 37.4% | 104 / 130 | 2024-25 |
| Residual household waste per household Lower is better | 342 kg | 516 kg | 9 / 130 | 2024-25 |
Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management
Complaints
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better | 8.8 | 4.8 | 110 / 130 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better | 82.5% | 81.9% | 69 / 130 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better | 93.3% | 75.0% | =27 / 128 | 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only | 100.0% | 100.0% | – | 2025-26 |
| Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only | 25.0% | 15.2% | – | 2025-26 |
Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data
Children's services
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is better | Outstanding | Good | =1 / 130 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
| Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is better | 3.75 / 4 | Good | =15 / 130 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes
Adult social care
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better | 52.8%Requires improvement assessment published 9 May 2025 | 63.9% | =106 / 126 | latest at 2026-11 |
| Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better | 0.385 | 0.417 | =122 / 129 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better | 55.3% | 65.5% | =123 / 129 | 2024-25 |
| Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better | 69.8% | 62.5% | =12 / 119 | 2024-25 |
| Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better | 65.0% | 83.9% | =123 / 129 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services who feel safe Higher is better | 56.0% | 70.7% | =122 / 129 | 2024-25 |
Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework
Special educational needs
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better | 86.4% | 58.3% | 21 / 130 | 2024 to 2025 |
Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans
Homelessness
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better | 40.5% | 51.7% | 107 / 130 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better | 29.3% | 33.5% | 85 / 130 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better | 17.1 | 2.8 | 109 / 126 | 2026-03 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context only | 0 | 0 | – | 2026-03 |
Value for money
Adult social care value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £636 per adult on adult social care, against about £592 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and London's higher costs (£43 more). Its adult social care results rank 122nd of 125.
Weaker results, higher cost · value for money rank 91st of 122
Children's services value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £2,043 per child on children's services, against about £1,498 expected after allowing for child poverty and London's higher costs (£545 more). Its children's services results rank 15th of 130.
Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 115th of 127
Waste value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £195 per home on waste & recycling, against about £195 expected after allowing for deprivation, London's higher costs and share of census output areas classed rural (£0 more). Its waste & recycling results rank 40th of 130.
Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 62nd of 127
Planning value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £-620 per planning decision on planning, against about £402 expected after allowing for London's higher costs (£1,022 less). Its planning results rank 96th of 130.
Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 14th of 127
Financial health
Reserves
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better | 117.4% | 33.0% | =1 / 127 | 2025-26 |
| Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better | 9.7% | 0.4% | 12 / 127 | 2025-26 |
Debt
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | -0.0% | 9.7% | =1 / 127 | 2025-26 |
| Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | 165.8% | 184.6% | 52 / 127 | 2024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend |
Schools funding deficit
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | 7.8% | 8.8% | 53 / 127 | 2025-26 |
Government bailouts
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 130 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better | 0.0% | 0.0% | =1 / 127 | 2024-25 to 2026-27 |
Context
Background figures. These don't count towards the score.
| Population | 190,216 | median 277,253 | mid-2025 |
| Net service spend per resident | £2,065.22 | median £2,026.28 | 2025-26 |
| Index of Multiple Deprivation average score | 21.202 | median 24.057 | 2025 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks | 0 | median 0 | 2026-03 |
| Who runs the council | Labour majority | 16 September 2026 | |
| Seats on the council | Labour 38, Conservative 12 (of 50 seats) | 16 September 2026 | |
| Audit opinion on the latest accounts | No audit opinion signed yet. PSAA status: unsigned. | 2025-26 | |
| Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed | 1 | median 1 | 2023-24 to 2025-26 |
| Band D council tax (council element) | £1,009.00 | median £1,969.00 | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax change on previous year | 5.0% | median 5.0% | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority) | £1,519.51 | median £2,435.01 | 2026-27 |
Also responsible in Hammersmith and Fulham
These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Hammersmith and Fulham's score.
- Greater London Authority: transport (TfL); strategic planning; police & crime (MOPAC); fire (LFB)
- Western Riverside Waste Authority: waste disposal
Councils nearby
The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.
- Kensington and Chelsea: 43rd of 130, upper middle · compare
- Wandsworth: 21st of 130, top quarter · compare
- Westminster: 66th of 130, lower middle · compare
- Ealing: 37th of 130, upper middle · compare
- Camden: 60th of 130, upper middle · compare
Questions about Hammersmith and Fulham
How good is Hammersmith and Fulham council?
Hammersmith and Fulham ranks 76th of 130 single-tier councils in England overall, in the lower middle, and 17th of 32 London boroughs. Its likely range is 45th to 96th. Its highest rank is on financial health (2nd of 127) and its lowest on value for money (110th of 127). Ranks are on official data for service quality, value for money and financial health; nearby places are similar, so read it as a position, not a verdict. How we score · Compare Hammersmith and Fulham
Is Hammersmith and Fulham a single-tier council?
Yes. Hammersmith and Fulham is a London borough (formally the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham), and runs almost all local services in its area itself, with no county or district council alongside it. A few services are run by other bodies, listed above. Who is ranked
ONS code E09000013 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog