Rankings · London borough
Hammersmith and Fulham
Likely range 24th–49th. Stays in the lower middle in 56% of re-runs. How we work this out
How Hammersmith and Fulham scores
Bar length shows the share of the 68 councils that Hammersmith and Fulham beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%.
Service quality
Planning
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major planning decisions made in time (24 months)Higher is better | 91.7% | 94.5% | =49 / 68 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months)Higher is better | 86.8% | 93.1% | 58 / 68 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Planning decisions in the financial yearHigher is better · context only | 1,321 | 1,247 | – | 2025-26 |
Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)
Waste & recycling
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household waste sent for reuse recycling or compostingHigher is better | 30.2% | 32.9% | 52 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| Residual household waste per householdLower is better | 342 kg | 504 kg | 8 / 68 | 2024-25 |
Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management
Complaints
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residentsLower is better | 8.8 | 5.6 | 52 / 68 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman investigations upheldLower is better | 82.5% | 82.4% | 35 / 68 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implemented on timeHigher is better | 93.3% | 74.7% | =12 / 68 | 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implementedHigher is better · context only | 100.0% | 100.0% | – | 2025-26 |
| Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the OmbudsmanHigher is better · context only | 25.0% | 15.2% | – | 2025-26 |
Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data
Children's services
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services)Higher is better | Outstanding | Good | =1 / 68 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
| Ofsted sub-judgements (average)Higher is better | 3.75 / 4 | Good | =10 / 68 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes
Adult social care
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted)Higher is better | 0.385 | 0.416 | 63 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services satisfied with their care and supportHigher is better | 55.3% | 63.0% | =65 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablementHigher is better | 69.8% | 62.9% | =5 / 64 | 2024-25 |
| People receiving long-term support who live in their own home or with familyHigher is better | 65.0% | 84.6% | =64 / 67 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services who feel safeHigher is better | 56.0% | 69.8% | =65 / 68 | 2024-25 |
Source: DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework
Special educational needs
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New EHC plans issued within 20 weeksHigher is better | 86.4% | 68.3% | 16 / 68 | 2024 to 2025 |
Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans
Homelessness
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ monthsHigher is better | 40.5% | 51.5% | 57 / 68 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ monthsHigher is better | 29.3% | 31.2% | 40 / 68 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 householdsLower is better | 17.1 | 7.0 | 51 / 68 | 2026-03 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeksLower is better · context only | 0 | 0 | – | 2026-03 |
Value for money
Adult social care value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £636 per adult on adult social care, against about £592 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and London's higher costs (£43 more). Its adult social care results rank 67th of 68.
Weaker results, higher cost · value for money rank 46th of 66
Children's services value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £2,043 per child on children's services, against about £1,532 expected after allowing for child poverty and London's higher costs (£511 more). Its children's services results rank 10th of 68.
Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 57th of 66
Waste value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £195 per home on waste & recycling, against about £194 expected after allowing for deprivation and London's higher costs (£1 more). Its waste & recycling results rank 23rd of 68.
Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 31st of 66
Planning value for money
Hammersmith and Fulham spends £-620 per planning decision on planning, against about £413 expected after allowing for London's higher costs (£1,033 less). Its planning results rank 56th of 68.
Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 1st of 66
Financial health
Reserves
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditureHigher is better | 117.4% | 34.7% | =1 / 66 | 2025-26 |
| Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditureHigher is better | 9.7% | 0.3% | =1 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Debt costs
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | -0.0% | 9.3% | =1 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Schools funding deficit
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 7.8% | 8.0% | 32 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Government bailouts
| Measure | Hammersmith and Fulham | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 0.0% | 0.0% | =1 / 66 | 2024-25 to 2026-27 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Context
Background figures. These don't count towards the score.
| Population | 190,216 | median 296,363 | mid-2025 |
| Net service spend per resident | £2,065.22 | median £2,139.02 | 2025-26 |
| Index of Multiple Deprivation average score | 21.202 | median 26.299 | 2025 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks | 0 | median 0 | 2026-03 |
| Band D council tax (council element) | £1,009.00 | median £1,884.22 | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax change on previous year | 5.0% | median 5.0% | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority) | £1,519.51 | median £2,319.87 | 2026-27 |
What residents say
Ratings from signed-in visitors. They are shown here for context and are not part of the official-data ranking.
Loading ratings…
Rate Hammersmith and Fulham
Loading…
Also responsible in Hammersmith and Fulham
These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Hammersmith and Fulham's score.
- Greater London Authority: transport (TfL); strategic planning; police & crime (MOPAC); fire (LFB)
- Western Riverside Waste Authority: waste disposal
ONS code E09000013 · How we score