Rankings · London borough in England

Separate leagues. England, Scotland and Wales are measured differently, so a rank in one is not comparable with another. Why. England is stable; Scotland and Wales are provisional.

Lewisham

Lewisham council ranks 102nd of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 75th to 115th), in the bottom quarter. Strongest on financial health (14th of 127), weakest on service quality (118th of 130).

Formally the London Borough of Lewisham.

Compare Lewisham with another council

Data period: Oldest figures 2024-25 (DEFRA and DHSC); newest as at 2026-11 (CQC). Published by CQC, DEFRA, DHSC, DfE, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, MHCLG and Ofsted.

Data last updated: · Last checked: . Sources publish on their own schedules, so figures can be older than the last check.

Methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "Lewisham council, Council Rankings, 1 November 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/lewisham/"

102nd of 130
single-tier councils in England
Bottom quarter

Likely range 75th–115th. Stays in the bottom quarter in 51% of re-runs. How we work this out

25th of 32
London boroughs only
Bottom quarter

How Lewisham scores

Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that Lewisham beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.

Service quality

Allowing for need, Lewisham ranks 117th of 130 (likely range 104th–123rd), against 118th unadjusted. That is about the same: need explains little of the difference between councils.

Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust

Planning

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better96.8%93.7%41 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better95.4%92.0%33 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only1,3031,092–2025-26

Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)

Waste & recycling

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better27.2%37.4%117 / 1302024-25
Residual household waste per household Lower is better502 kg516 kg56 / 1302024-25

Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management

Complaints

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better13.74.8=124 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better87.2%81.9%98 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better60.5%75.0%101 / 1282025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only97.4%100.0%–2025-26
Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only8.9%15.2%–2025-26

Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data

Children's services

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is betterGoodGood=40 / 130latest at 2026-03-31
Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is betterGoodGood=56 / 130latest at 2026-03-31

Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes

Adult social care

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better58.3%Requires improvement assessment published 7 August 202663.9%=86 / 126latest at 2026-11
Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better0.4060.417=88 / 1292024-25
People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better60.8%65.5%107 / 1292024-25
Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better58.3%62.5%88 / 1192024-25
Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better84.4%83.9%=58 / 1292024-25
People who use services who feel safe Higher is better68.8%70.7%=82 / 1292024-25

Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework

Special educational needs

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better22.9%58.3%114 / 1302024 to 2025

Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans

Homelessness

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better48.3%51.7%80 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better42.2%33.5%34 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better18.42.8110 / 1262026-03
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context onlyNot reported this quarter0–2026-03

Source: MHCLG — Statutory homelessness statistics

Value for money

Adult social care value for money

Lewisham spends £526 per adult on adult social care, against about £566 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and London's higher costs (£40 less). Its adult social care results rank 103rd of 125.

Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 30th of 122

Children's services value for money

Lewisham spends £2,264 per child on children's services, against about £1,572 expected after allowing for child poverty and London's higher costs (£693 more). Its children's services results rank 56th of 130.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 118th of 127

Waste value for money

Lewisham spends £141 per home on waste & recycling, against about £198 expected after allowing for deprivation, London's higher costs and share of census output areas classed rural (£57 less). Its waste & recycling results rank 92nd of 130.

Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 4th of 127

Planning value for money

Lewisham spends £371 per planning decision on planning, against about £402 expected after allowing for London's higher costs (£31 less). Its planning results rank 35th of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 66th of 127

Financial health

Reserves

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better85.6%33.0%8 / 1272025-26
Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better4.3%0.4%33 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Debt

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better15.4%9.7%105 / 1272025-26
Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better160.3%184.6%49 / 1272024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Schools funding deficit

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better8.5%8.8%61 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Government bailouts

MeasureLewishamMedian of 130RankPeriod
Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better0.0%0.0%=1 / 1272024-25 to 2026-27

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Context

Background figures. These don't count towards the score.

Population301,037median 277,253mid-2025
Net service spend per resident£2,759.41median £2,026.282025-26
Index of Multiple Deprivation average score25.472median 24.0572025
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeksNot reported this quartermedian 02026-03
Who runs the councilGreen directly elected mayor16 September 2026
Seats on the councilGreen 39, Labour 14, Independent and other 1 (of 54 seats)16 September 2026
Audit opinion on the latest accountsNo audit opinion signed yet. PSAA status: unsigned.2025-26
Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed1median 12023-24 to 2025-26
Band D council tax (council element)£1,726.82median £1,969.002026-27
Band D council tax change on previous year5.0%median 5.0%2026-27
Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority)£2,237.33median £2,435.012026-27

Also responsible in Lewisham

These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Lewisham's score.

Councils nearby

The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.

Full ranking of London boroughs · All 130 councils

Questions about Lewisham

How good is Lewisham council?

Lewisham ranks 102nd of 130 single-tier councils in England overall, in the bottom quarter, and 25th of 32 London boroughs. Its likely range is 75th to 115th. Its highest rank is on financial health (14th of 127) and its lowest on service quality (118th of 130). Ranks are on official data for service quality, value for money and financial health; nearby places are similar, so read it as a position, not a verdict. How we score · Compare Lewisham

Is Lewisham a single-tier council?

Yes. Lewisham is a London borough (formally the London Borough of Lewisham), and runs almost all local services in its area itself, with no county or district council alongside it. A few services are run by other bodies, listed above. Who is ranked

ONS code E09000023 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog