Rankings · Metropolitan borough
Newcastle upon Tyne
Likely range 42nd–59th. Stays in the bottom quarter in 64% of re-runs. How we work this out
How Newcastle upon Tyne scores
Bar length shows the share of the 68 councils that Newcastle upon Tyne beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%.
Service quality
Planning
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major planning decisions made in time (24 months)Higher is better | 87.7% | 94.5% | 58 / 68 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months)Higher is better | 82.4% | 93.1% | 64 / 68 | 2024 Q3 to 2026 Q2 |
| Planning decisions in the financial yearHigher is better · context only | 1,005 | 1,247 | – | 2025-26 |
Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)
Waste & recycling
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household waste sent for reuse recycling or compostingHigher is better | 25.9% | 32.9% | 62 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| Residual household waste per householdLower is better | 567 kg | 504 kg | 51 / 68 | 2024-25 |
Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management
Complaints
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residentsLower is better | 2.5 | 5.6 | 5 / 68 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman investigations upheldLower is better | 72.7% | 82.4% | 8 / 68 | 2024-25 to 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implemented on timeHigher is better | 57.1% | 74.7% | =53 / 68 | 2025-26 |
| Ombudsman recommendations implementedHigher is better · context only | 100.0% | 100.0% | – | 2025-26 |
| Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the OmbudsmanHigher is better · context only | 11.1% | 15.2% | – | 2025-26 |
Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data
Children's services
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services)Higher is better | Good | Good | =25 / 68 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
| Ofsted sub-judgements (average)Higher is better | Good | Good | =33 / 68 | latest at 2026-03-31 |
Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes
Adult social care
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted)Higher is better | 0.399 | 0.416 | =53 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services satisfied with their care and supportHigher is better | 64.9% | 63.0% | 27 / 68 | 2024-25 |
| Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablementHigher is better | 61.7% | 62.9% | 40 / 64 | 2024-25 |
| People receiving long-term support who live in their own home or with familyHigher is better | 90.0% | 84.6% | 8 / 67 | 2024-25 |
| People who use services who feel safeHigher is better | 74.9% | 69.8% | 10 / 68 | 2024-25 |
Source: DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework
Special educational needs
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New EHC plans issued within 20 weeksHigher is better | 15.4% | 68.3% | =65 / 68 | 2024 to 2025 |
Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans
Homelessness
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ monthsHigher is better | 46.1% | 51.5% | 42 / 68 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ monthsHigher is better | 35.6% | 31.2% | 24 / 68 | 2025-09 to 2026-03 |
| Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 householdsLower is better | 1.6 | 7.0 | 16 / 68 | 2026-03 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeksLower is better · context only | Not reported this quarter | 0 | – | 2026-03 |
Value for money
Adult social care value for money
Newcastle upon Tyne spends £668 per adult on adult social care, against about £605 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and whether a council is in London (£63 more). Its adult social care results rank 32nd of 68.
Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 58th of 66
Children's services value for money
Newcastle upon Tyne spends £1,620 per child on children's services, against about £1,639 expected after allowing for child poverty and whether a council is in London (£19 less). Its children's services results rank 33rd of 68.
Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 38th of 66
Waste value for money
Newcastle upon Tyne spends £200 per home on waste & recycling, against about £186 expected after allowing for deprivation and whether a council is in London (£14 more). Its waste & recycling results rank 58th of 68.
Weaker results, higher cost · value for money rank 47th of 66
Planning value for money
Newcastle upon Tyne spends £2,070 per planning decision on planning, against about £632 expected after allowing for whether a council is in London (£1,437 more). Its planning results rank 66th of 68.
Weaker results, higher cost · value for money rank 59th of 66
Financial health
Reserves
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditureHigher is better | 68.9% | 34.7% | 12 / 66 | 2025-26 |
| Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditureHigher is better | 7.2% | 0.3% | 6 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Debt costs
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 12.6% | 9.3% | 44 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Schools funding deficit
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 2.0% | 8.0% | 14 / 66 | 2025-26 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Government bailouts
| Measure | Newcastle upon Tyne | Median of 68 | Rank | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditureLower is better | 0.0% | 0.0% | =1 / 66 | 2024-25 to 2026-27 |
Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics
Context
Background figures. These don't count towards the score.
| Population | 320,838 | median 296,363 | mid-2025 |
| Net service spend per resident | £1,909.46 | median £2,139.02 | 2025-26 |
| Index of Multiple Deprivation average score | 28.834 | median 26.299 | 2025 |
| Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks | Not reported this quarter | median 0 | 2026-03 |
| Band D council tax (council element) | £2,221.21 | median £1,884.22 | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax change on previous year | 5.0% | median 5.0% | 2026-27 |
| Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority) | £2,542.19 | median £2,319.87 | 2026-27 |
What residents say
Ratings from signed-in visitors. They are shown here for context and are not part of the official-data ranking.
Loading ratings…
Rate Newcastle upon Tyne
Loading…
Also responsible in Newcastle upon Tyne
These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Newcastle upon Tyne's score.
- North East Combined Authority: transport; adult skills; economic development
ONS code E08000021 · How we score