Rankings · Metropolitan borough in England

Separate leagues. England, Scotland and Wales are measured differently, so a rank in one is not comparable with another. Why. England is stable; Scotland and Wales are provisional.

North Tyneside

North Tyneside council ranks 57th of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 37th to 74th), in the upper middle. Strongest on value for money (51st of 127), weakest on service quality (65th of 130).

Compare North Tyneside with another council

Data period: Oldest figures 2024-25 (DEFRA and DHSC); newest as at 2026-11 (CQC). Published by CQC, DEFRA, DHSC, DfE, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, MHCLG and Ofsted.

Data last updated: · Last checked: . Sources publish on their own schedules, so figures can be older than the last check.

Methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "North Tyneside council, Council Rankings, 1 November 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/north-tyneside/"

57th of 130
single-tier councils in England
Upper middle

Likely range 37th–74th. Stays in the upper middle in 76% of re-runs. How we work this out

24th of 36
metropolitan boroughs only
Lower middle

How North Tyneside scores

Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that North Tyneside beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.

Service quality

Allowing for need, North Tyneside ranks 71st of 130 (likely range 50th–90th), against 65th unadjusted. That is 6 places lower once need is allowed for, within the likely range.

Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust

Planning

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better100.0%93.7%=1 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better99.1%92.0%10 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only6161,092–2025-26

Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)

Waste & recycling

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better33.5%37.4%=81 / 1302024-25
Residual household waste per household Lower is better546 kg516 kg89 / 1302024-25

Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management

Complaints

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better5.64.878 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better82.8%81.9%71 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better77.8%75.0%=54 / 1282025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only100.0%100.0%–2025-26
Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only37.5%15.2%–2025-26

Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data

Children's services

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is betterOutstandingGood=1 / 130latest at 2026-03-31
Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is betterOutstandingGood=1 / 130latest at 2026-03-31

Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes

Adult social care

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better63.9%Good assessment published 9 July 202563.9%=55 / 126latest at 2026-11
Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better0.4090.417=84 / 1292024-25
People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better59.9%65.5%111 / 1292024-25
Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better62.0%62.5%65 / 1192024-25
Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better89.0%83.9%=21 / 1292024-25
People who use services who feel safe Higher is better68.7%70.7%=85 / 1292024-25

Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework

Special educational needs

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better31.7%58.3%100 / 1302024 to 2025

Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans

Homelessness

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better38.5%51.7%111 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better25.8%33.5%97 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better0.72.814 / 1262026-03
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context only00–2026-03

Source: MHCLG — Statutory homelessness statistics

Value for money

Adult social care value for money

North Tyneside spends £556 per adult on adult social care, against about £632 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and whether a council is in London (£76 less). Its adult social care results rank 85th of 125.

Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 8th of 122

Children's services value for money

North Tyneside spends £1,737 per child on children's services, against about £1,504 expected after allowing for child poverty and whether a council is in London (£234 more). Its children's services results rank 1st of 130.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 96th of 127

Waste value for money

North Tyneside spends £186 per home on waste & recycling, against about £173 expected after allowing for deprivation, whether a council is in London and share of census output areas classed rural (£13 more). Its waste & recycling results rank 84th of 130.

Weaker results, higher cost · value for money rank 91st of 127

Planning value for money

North Tyneside spends £213 per planning decision on planning, against about £702 expected after allowing for whether a council is in London (£489 less). Its planning results rank 6th of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 34th of 127

Financial health

Reserves

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better16.4%33.0%108 / 1272025-26
Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better-0.4%0.4%73 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Debt

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better13.0%9.7%90 / 1272025-26
Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better177.4%184.6%59 / 1272024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Schools funding deficit

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better6.0%8.8%43 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Government bailouts

MeasureNorth TynesideMedian of 130RankPeriod
Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better0.0%0.0%=1 / 1272024-25 to 2026-27

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Context

Background figures. These don't count towards the score.

Population215,401median 277,253mid-2025
Net service spend per resident£2,352.64median £2,026.282025-26
Index of Multiple Deprivation average score20.932median 24.0572025
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks0median 02026-03
Who runs the councilLabour directly elected mayor16 September 2026
Seats on the councilLabour 38, Reform UK 11, Conservative 8, Green 2, Independent and other 1 (of 60 seats)16 September 2026
Audit opinion on the latest accountsNo audit opinion signed yet. PSAA status: unsigned.2025-26
Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed1median 12023-24 to 2025-26
Band D council tax (council element)£2,142.32median £1,969.002026-27
Band D council tax change on previous year5.0%median 5.0%2026-27
Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority)£2,461.77median £2,435.012026-27

Also responsible in North Tyneside

These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards North Tyneside's score.

Councils nearby

The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.

Full ranking of metropolitan boroughs · All 130 councils

Questions about North Tyneside

How good is North Tyneside council?

North Tyneside ranks 57th of 130 single-tier councils in England overall, in the upper middle, and 24th of 36 metropolitan boroughs. Its likely range is 37th to 74th. Its highest rank is on value for money (51st of 127) and its lowest on financial health (64th of 127). Ranks are on official data for service quality, value for money and financial health; nearby places are similar, so read it as a position, not a verdict. How we score · Compare North Tyneside

Is North Tyneside a single-tier council?

Yes. North Tyneside is a metropolitan borough, and runs almost all local services in its area itself, with no county or district council alongside it. A few services are run by other bodies, listed above. Who is ranked

ONS code E08000022 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog