Rankings · London borough in England

Separate leagues. England, Scotland and Wales are measured differently, so a rank in one is not comparable with another. Why. England is stable; Scotland and Wales are provisional.

Brent

Brent council ranks 79th of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 53rd to 93rd), in the lower middle. Strongest on value for money (10th of 127), weakest on service quality (98th of 130).

Formally the London Borough of Brent.

Compare Brent with another council

Data period: Oldest figures 2024-25 (DEFRA and DHSC); newest as at 2026-11 (CQC). Published by CQC, DEFRA, DHSC, DfE, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, MHCLG and Ofsted.

Data last updated: · Last checked: . Sources publish on their own schedules, so figures can be older than the last check.

Methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "Brent council, Council Rankings, 1 November 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/brent/"

79th of 130
single-tier councils in England
Lower middle

Likely range 53rd–93rd. Stays in the lower middle in 73% of re-runs. How we work this out

22nd of 32
London boroughs only
Lower middle

How Brent scores

Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that Brent beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.

Service quality

Allowing for need, Brent ranks 91st of 130 (likely range 70th–102nd), against 98th unadjusted. That is 7 places higher once need is allowed for, within the likely range.

Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust

Planning

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better100.0%93.7%=1 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better94.2%92.0%42 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only1,9631,092–2025-26

Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)

Waste & recycling

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better32.9%37.4%=84 / 1302024-25
Residual household waste per household Lower is better423 kg516 kg28 / 1302024-25

Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management

Complaints

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better8.34.8105 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better92.1%81.9%119 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better62.1%75.0%97 / 1282025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only100.0%100.0%–2025-26
Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only18.9%15.2%–2025-26

Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data

Children's services

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is betterGoodGood=40 / 130latest at 2026-03-31
Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is betterGoodGood=56 / 130latest at 2026-03-31

Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes

Adult social care

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better61.1%Requires improvement assessment published 16 August 202463.9%=77 / 126latest at 2026-11
Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better0.3980.417111 / 1292024-25
People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better53.0%65.5%=123 / 1292024-25
Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better64.4%62.5%47 / 1192024-25
Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better89.5%83.9%19 / 1292024-25
People who use services who feel safe Higher is better60.4%70.7%=122 / 1292024-25

Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework

Special educational needs

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better79.8%58.3%35 / 1302024 to 2025

Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans

Homelessness

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better27.8%51.7%=124 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better30.7%33.5%79 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better19.92.8113 / 1262026-03
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context only00–2026-03

Source: MHCLG — Statutory homelessness statistics

Value for money

Adult social care value for money

Brent spends £559 per adult on adult social care, against about £587 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and London's higher costs (£28 less). Its adult social care results rank 105th of 125.

Weaker results, lower cost · value for money rank 41st of 122

Children's services value for money

Brent spends £1,300 per child on children's services, against about £1,818 expected after allowing for child poverty and London's higher costs (£518 less). Its children's services results rank 56th of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 9th of 127

Waste value for money

Brent spends £186 per home on waste & recycling, against about £202 expected after allowing for deprivation, London's higher costs and share of census output areas classed rural (£16 less). Its waste & recycling results rank 55th of 130.

Good results, lower cost · value for money rank 39th of 127

Planning value for money

Brent spends £639 per planning decision on planning, against about £402 expected after allowing for London's higher costs (£236 more). Its planning results rank 26th of 130.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 82nd of 127

Financial health

Reserves

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better38.7%33.0%49 / 1272025-26
Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better-4.3%0.4%106 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Debt

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better17.4%9.7%114 / 1272025-26
Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better311.5%184.6%105 / 1272024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Schools funding deficit

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better6.4%8.8%47 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Government bailouts

MeasureBrentMedian of 130RankPeriod
Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better0.0%0.0%=1 / 1272024-25 to 2026-27

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Context

Background figures. These don't count towards the score.

Population352,201median 277,253mid-2025
Net service spend per resident£2,136.75median £2,026.282025-26
Index of Multiple Deprivation average score30.046median 24.0572025
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks0median 02026-03
Who runs the councilLabour minority administration16 September 2026
Seats on the councilLabour 26, Conservative 11, Liberal Democrat 11, Green 9 (of 57 seats)16 September 2026
Audit opinion on the latest accountsNo audit opinion signed yet. PSAA status: unsigned.2025-26
Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed1median 12023-24 to 2025-26
Band D council tax (council element)£1,724.76median £1,969.002026-27
Band D council tax change on previous year5.0%median 5.0%2026-27
Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority)£2,235.27median £2,435.012026-27

Also responsible in Brent

These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Brent's score.

Councils nearby

The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.

Full ranking of London boroughs · All 130 councils

Questions about Brent

How good is Brent council?

Brent ranks 79th of 130 single-tier councils in England overall, in the lower middle, and 22nd of 32 London boroughs. Its likely range is 53rd to 93rd. Its highest rank is on value for money (10th of 127) and its lowest on service quality (98th of 130). Ranks are on official data for service quality, value for money and financial health; nearby places are similar, so read it as a position, not a verdict. How we score · Compare Brent

Is Brent a single-tier council?

Yes. Brent is a London borough (formally the London Borough of Brent), and runs almost all local services in its area itself, with no county or district council alongside it. A few services are run by other bodies, listed above. Who is ranked

ONS code E09000005 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog