Rankings · London borough in England

Separate leagues. England, Scotland and Wales are measured differently, so a rank in one is not comparable with another. Why. England is stable; Scotland and Wales are provisional.

Richmond upon Thames

Richmond upon Thames council ranks 19th of 130 single-tier councils in England (likely range 6th to 39th), in the top quarter. Strongest on service quality (7th of 130), weakest on value for money (121st of 127).

Formally the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames.

Compare Richmond upon Thames with another council

Data period: Oldest figures 2024-25 (DEFRA and DHSC); newest as at 2026-11 (CQC). Published by CQC, DEFRA, DHSC, DfE, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, MHCLG and Ofsted.

Data last updated: · Last checked: . Sources publish on their own schedules, so figures can be older than the last check.

Methodology v2.0 (stable) · to cite: "Richmond upon Thames council, Council Rankings, 1 November 2026, https://councilrankings.com/council/richmond-upon-thames/"

19th of 130
single-tier councils in England
Top quarter

Likely range 6th–39th. Stays in the top quarter in 90% of re-runs. How we work this out

2nd of 32
London boroughs only
Top quarter

How Richmond upon Thames scores

Bar length shows the share of the 130 councils that Richmond upon Thames beats. Overall weights: service quality 60%, value for money 20%, financial health 20%. Select any measure below to see how every council compares on it.

Service quality

Allowing for need, Richmond upon Thames ranks 11th of 130 (likely range 6th–24th), against 7th unadjusted. That is about the same: need explains little of the difference between councils.

Adjusted: children's services, adult social care and waste & recycling. Not adjusted, because there is no published measure of need: planning, complaints, special educational needs and homelessness. This view is not part of the overall rank. How we adjust

Planning

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better100.0%93.7%=1 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Non-major planning decisions made in time (24 months) Higher is better94.7%92.0%39 / 1302024 Q3 to 2026 Q2
Planning decisions in the financial year Higher is better · context only1,8881,092–2025-26

Source: MHCLG — Planning application statistics (PS2)

Waste & recycling

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Household waste sent for reuse recycling or composting Higher is better42.6%37.4%48 / 1302024-25
Residual household waste per household Lower is better486 kg516 kg47 / 1302024-25

Source: DEFRA — Local authority collected waste management

Complaints

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ombudsman upheld decisions per 100k residents Lower is better3.84.845 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman investigations upheld Lower is better88.2%81.9%104 / 1302024-25 to 2025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented on time Higher is better80.0%75.0%=50 / 1282025-26
Ombudsman recommendations implemented Higher is better · context only100.0%100.0%–2025-26
Upheld complaints already remedied by the council before reaching the Ombudsman Higher is better · context only14.3%15.2%–2025-26

Source: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman — annual review data

Children's services

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Ofsted overall effectiveness (children's services) Higher is betterOutstandingGood=1 / 130latest at 2026-03-31
Ofsted sub-judgements (average) Higher is better3.75 / 4Good=15 / 130latest at 2026-03-31

Source: Ofsted — Local authority inspection outcomes

Adult social care

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
CQC assessment score for adult social care Higher is better75.0%Good assessment published 13 March 202663.9%=10 / 126latest at 2026-11
Quality of life of people who use services (adjusted) Higher is better0.4110.417=77 / 1292024-25
People who use services satisfied with their care and support Higher is better65.2%65.5%69 / 1292024-25
Older people still at home 12 weeks after hospital discharge into reablement Higher is better63.4%62.5%52 / 1192024-25
Adults aged 18 to 64 with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family Higher is better76.9%83.9%105 / 1292024-25
People who use services who feel safe Higher is better73.9%70.7%28 / 1292024-25

Source: CQC — Local authority assessment reports; DHSC — Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework

Special educational needs

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks Higher is better95.3%58.3%10 / 1302024 to 2025

Source: DfE — Education, health and care plans

Homelessness

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Homelessness prevented: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better58.6%51.7%43 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Homelessness relieved: accommodation secured for 6+ months Higher is better19.9%33.5%114 / 1302025-09 to 2026-03
Households in temporary accommodation per 1000 households Lower is better8.32.888 / 1262026-03
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks Lower is better · context only00–2026-03

Source: MHCLG — Statutory homelessness statistics

Value for money

Adult social care value for money

Richmond upon Thames spends £616 per adult on adult social care, against about £509 expected after allowing for older people's poverty, how many residents are over 65 and London's higher costs (£107 more). Its adult social care results rank 36th of 125.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 118th of 122

Children's services value for money

Richmond upon Thames spends £1,575 per child on children's services, against about £1,184 expected after allowing for child poverty and London's higher costs (£392 more). Its children's services results rank 15th of 130.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 108th of 127

Waste value for money

Richmond upon Thames spends £195 per home on waste & recycling, against about £185 expected after allowing for deprivation, London's higher costs and share of census output areas classed rural (£9 more). Its waste & recycling results rank 49th of 130.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 79th of 127

Planning value for money

Richmond upon Thames spends £435 per planning decision on planning, against about £402 expected after allowing for London's higher costs (£33 more). Its planning results rank 24th of 130.

Good results, higher cost · value for money rank 73rd of 127

Financial health

Reserves

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Usable reserves as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better48.1%33.0%34 / 1272025-26
Change in usable reserves over the year as a share of net revenue expenditure Higher is better-4.9%0.4%112 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Debt

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Debt servicing costs as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better4.5%9.7%16 / 1272025-26
Borrowing need (excluding council housing) as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better93.1%184.6%12 / 1272024-25 borrowing, 2025-26 spend

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Schools funding deficit

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
High-needs (DSG) deficit as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better8.3%8.8%59 / 1272025-26

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Government bailouts

MeasureRichmond upon ThamesMedian of 130RankPeriod
Exceptional Financial Support over three years as a share of net revenue expenditure Lower is better0.0%0.0%=1 / 1272024-25 to 2026-27

Source: Calculated from MHCLG Revenue Outturn and Capital Outturn Return, ONS population, MHCLG dwelling stock and planning statistics

Context

Background figures. These don't count towards the score.

Population196,713median 277,253mid-2025
Net service spend per resident£2,174.76median £2,026.282025-26
Index of Multiple Deprivation average score9.532median 24.0572025
Families with children in B&B for more than 6 weeks0median 02026-03
Who runs the councilLiberal Democrat majority16 September 2026
Seats on the councilLiberal Democrat 54 (of 54 seats)16 September 2026
Audit opinion on the latest accountsNo audit opinion signed yet. PSAA status: unsigned.2025-26
Years of the last three with no audit opinion signed1median 12023-24 to 2025-26
Band D council tax (council element)£1,975.59median £1,969.002026-27
Band D council tax change on previous year5.0%median 5.0%2026-27
Band D council tax total bill (incl. GLA/police/fire/combined authority)£2,486.10median £2,435.012026-27

Also responsible in Richmond upon Thames

These services are run by other bodies, so they don't count towards Richmond upon Thames's score.

Councils nearby

The closest ranked councils by distance between council centres. Nearness says nothing about how similar they are.

Full ranking of London boroughs · All 130 councils

Questions about Richmond upon Thames

How good is Richmond upon Thames council?

Richmond upon Thames ranks 19th of 130 single-tier councils in England overall, in the top quarter, and 2nd of 32 London boroughs. Its likely range is 6th to 39th. Its highest rank is on service quality (7th of 130) and its lowest on value for money (121st of 127). Ranks are on official data for service quality, value for money and financial health; nearby places are similar, so read it as a position, not a verdict. How we score · Compare Richmond upon Thames

Is Richmond upon Thames a single-tier council?

Yes. Richmond upon Thames is a London borough (formally the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames), and runs almost all local services in its area itself, with no county or district council alongside it. A few services are run by other bodies, listed above. Who is ranked

ONS code E09000027 · How we score · Report an error · Changelog